Recommendations of the URA Observer regarding Kodiak Field Officers

Executive Summary

This report presents a strategic personnel management plan aimed at optimizing leadership roles within the military structure to address the evolving nature of modern warfare, particularly in countering non-conventional forces and hybrid threats. The recommendations are designed to leverage the unique strengths of each officer while mitigating potential negative impacts from their political leanings or conservative views. The proposed shifts are intended to enhance operational efficiency, foster innovation, and prepare the next generation of officers to effectively navigate the complexities of contemporary military engagements.

Detailed Assessment and Recommendations

FM Falkenridge

• Current Position and Challenges: FM Falkenridge currently holds a field command position. His conservative views are assessed as potentially less beneficial for countering non-conventional forces and hybrid threats. Directly sacking him could lead to unwanted repercussions among his subordinates.
• Recommendation: It is advised to promote or transition FM Falkenridge out of his current role. Given his experience, a shift towards a position like Army Chief of Staff, or alternatively, retirement with opportunities for him to contribute as a defense analyst on television, would be prudent. This move would preserve his dignity and the morale of his subordinates while aligning his skills with roles where they can be most effective.

MG Hayes

• Current Position and Challenges: MG Hayes is currently positioned in a role that does not fully capitalize on his potential. His political leanings present a risk of unduly influencing the next generation of officers.
• Recommendation: Reassign MG Hayes to a new command focused on innovation. This assignment would harness his strengths and mitigate risks associated with his political leanings. Additionally, this reassignment facilitates the promotion and placement of other officers in positions where they are more needed.

BG Crane

• Assessment: BG Crane possesses the skills necessary to reorganize special forces for Counterinsurgency (COIN) operations. However, his political views pose similar challenges to those of MG Hayes.
• Note: While specific recommendations for BG Crane are not outlined in the final steps, it is implicit that a role leveraging his COIN expertise while minimizing political influence should be sought.

Hammond and Merrit

• Current Position and Challenges: The roles of Hammond and Merrit are currently reversed, limiting their potential effectiveness.
• Recommendation: Promote Hammond to the Executive Officer (XO) of 1KA and Merrit to command II Corp. This realignment ensures that their strengths are optimally utilized in roles that are critical for operational success.

BG Calloway

• Current Position and Challenges: BG Calloway presents a balanced option, politically and strategically, for a leadership role.
• Recommendation: Promote BG Calloway to Major General (MG) and assign him to command 1KA. His strategic focus and political neutrality make him an ideal candidate to oversee major operations.

Final Recommendations: Actionable Steps

1. Promote (or Retire) FM Falkenridge: Transition FM Falkenridge to a role outside of field command, such as Army Chief of Staff, or consider retirement, providing him opportunities to contribute as a defense analyst on television.
2. Promote BG Calloway to MG and Assign to Command 1KA: Recognizing BG Calloway's strategic acumen and political neutrality, his promotion will bolster leadership at 1KA.
3. Promote BG Hammond to MG and Assign as 1KA Executive Officer: This promotion acknowledges Hammond's capabilities and places him in a pivotal role within 1KA.
4. Reassign MG Hayes to a Command Focused on Innovation: This strategic move leverages MG Hayes's strengths while addressing concerns related to his political influence, simultaneously making room for Hammond's promotion and new assignment.

These recommendations are presented with the understanding that strategic personnel adjustments are critical for maintaining operational readiness and effectiveness in the face of evolving threats and challenges. The proposed changes aim to optimize leadership within the military, ensuring that each role is filled by officers whose skills, experience, and perspectives are best aligned with the demands of those positions.