Navigation menu

Case Study: Army Redesign 646 - 644: Difference between revisions

From The Kodiak Republic Wiki

m
10 revisions imported
FDold>AtlanticaTKR
m (10 revisions imported)
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
== Introduction ==
Since 618, the Kodiaker Army relied on the Brigade Tactical Group (BTG) organized within the construct of the Square Division concept as a 3+1 design.  This consisted of three mechanized brigades (subdivided into three mechanized battalions with one tank battalion) and one tank brigade (subdivided into fourthree tank battalions and one mechanized battalion).   These brigades were then augmented with Division level support elements to form the BTG with additional artillery, engineers, and logistic enablers.  This was seen as a way to augment the shortfalls of the army during years of downsizing amid lowered budgets and a border crisis that resulted in an active army presence to maintain forward units capable of independent actions at the tactical level.
[[File:Army Square Division.png|thumb|606x606px|The Square Orgaization of the Division with four manuever brigades.]]
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
With the threat of looming conflict against a peer level Regional Power, the possibility of Large Scale Combat Operations (LSCO) is higher than ever.  Due to the complicated nature of LSCO, supporting so many augmented brigades across the whole Ground Force would take away the options of the Operational Commander to shape the battlefield.  In order to refocus the objectives of Operational and Strategic headquarters, a force redesign is required to restore the capability of Division and Corps echelons to achieve deep effects on the battlefield.
Line 17 ⟶ 9:
 
== Objective  ==
With the passage of the National Defense Authorization for 643, the push for modernization and expansion of the military is at an all time high.  To facilitate the growth needed to create new combat divisions for the army, a force redesign will help achieve this through a cadre of established soldiers from existing units forming the core of new units. The Army will shift to a TriganleTriangle concept of organization with three maneuver brigades instead of the previous four. The Division Tactical Group will become the unit of action, coordinating combat support and other enabling elements to its brigades.
[[File:Army Triangle Division.png|thumb|619x619px|The Triangle Division, the Army Force Design for 646.]]
 
 
 
 
Line 40 ⟶ 34:
Due to the threat of potential conflict and the need to fill the military’s personnel gaps quickly, the possibility of conscription cannot be ruled out.  Training and recruitment windows will need to be aligned to enable synergy between career soldier requirements and conscript requirements.  These windows of conscription will be divided between two classes.   A Spring class that is trained during Q1-Q2 of the calendar year and a Fall Class that is trained during Q3-Q4 of the calendar year.  These conscript classes will then prepare to join their respective units during the proceeding training blocks of the year.
[[File:Army Training Cycle.png|thumb|465x465px|Training and Conscription Cycles in the event of conscription being enacted.]]
 
 
 
 
Line 50 ⟶ 46:
 
== Division Models ==
Because of the transformation of from Square Division to a Triangle Division, the roles and responsibilities for division types will be redesigned.  A break down of the Division Types follows.
 
Mechanized Divisions provide the Army with supportive infantry forces to support the Penetration Division’s attacks in the area of operations.  These units enable rapid movement and the ability to defend or consolidate control of territory.
Line 61 ⟶ 57:
 
[[File:Kodiak Army org 646.png|thumb|599x599px|Division Types across the Army in Redesign 646]]
 
 
 
 
 
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.