Talk:Stability and Freedom Enhancement (SAFE) Act, 644

Patrick Barber — 09/09/2022 @Assembly Member Tabled for consideration to the assembly: Stability and Freedom Enhancement (SAFE) Act, 644 An act to punish and combat acts of terrorism within the borders of the Republic. https://kodiak.fandom.com/wiki/Stability_and_Freedom_Enhancement_(SAFE)_Act,_644 Proposed by Chancellor Oskar Luchens, NUP Co-sponsored by Deputy Minister for Homeland Security Simon Kalimeno, MGA, NUP Voting is currently set for 30 September 2022 Klaus Mikaelson — 10/09/2022 Correct me if I'm wrong, but you've set the budget for the three listed organizations total as around 2.3 billion per year. Where did this figure come from? Oskar Luchens (NUP) — 10/09/2022 Each of the listed organizations within this Act will be drawing their funds from the existing budgets of the organizations they are subordinate to. Instead of raising spending, just reallocating their pots of money. As of the last published budget those organizations were as follows: National Police: 5.7 Billion Intelligence: 2.4 Billion National Budget: 87 Billion Patrick Barber — 12/09/2022 I would just like to ask the @Chancellor is the RTSC and the 'special court of appeals' transparent courts? Oskar Luchens (NUP) — 12/09/2022 Indeed the courts are transparent in cases that can be made without a need for use of classified materials. However during prosecution using such information, the courts will be restricted to those deemed authorize to hear it. Likewise, the SCA conducts business in the same fashion Patrick Barber — 12/09/2022 i don't see anything especially problematic at first reading. I look forward to the contributions of my colleague @Assembly Members John Edwards [KWP] — 12/09/2022 I can see this being beneficial in the current climate. It doesn't draw any extra from the treasury, Revenue and Treasury can support this. One question though, "direct action force to subdue threats to the republic in the event local police are unable" Does this mean they would act only upon police request? Or will they also be acting independently when a jurisdictional issue arises? In that event, where does jurisdiction settle? eg. Police identify a potential terrorist threat, but do not call in CTS. Do CTS take control? Oskar Luchens (NUP) — 13/09/2022 CTS should have priority jurisdiction in all cases involving terrorism. But it won’t preclude the police from actioning a potential threat in the moment to prevent an attack. Patrick Barber — 23/09/2022 @Assembly Member I would like to ask for any input on this particular piece of legislation. perrysmarts — 23/09/2022 I think that this piece of legislation is perfect in it's current form. Oskar Luchens (NUP) — 03/10/2022 Mr President I’d like to motion the vote since we have passed the set date for debate. Aaron Tonnesen - New Asden — 03/10/2022 I second. EasyPoll BOT — 03/10/2022 Question Do you support this resolution? Choices 🇦 Aye 🇧 Nay 🇨 Abstain Final Result 🇦 ▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░ [5 • 56%] 🇧 ▓▓░░░░░░░░ [2 • 22%] 🇨 ▓▓░░░░░░░░ [2 • 22%] 9 users voted Settings
 * alarm_clock: Poll already ended (2 days ago)
 * spy: Anonymous Poll
 * one: allowed choice


 * lock: No other votes allowed

Allowed roles: @Assembly Member Poll ID: Fnym75nQDm Tobias Virstürm (PPK) — 03/10/2022 @Assembly President Tobias Virstürm (PPK) — 04/10/2022 Members of the assembly. This resolution is up for a vote. The voting period will be for 72 hours. Further discussion will only be permitted in the 🔆｜lobby channel. Thank you. Tobias Virstürm (PPK) — Yesterday at 00:49 @Assembly President